“The Anaphor Agreement Effect is not about featural deficiency: Evidence from Avar.” Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 5(1): 1–19.


 download pdf

This paper discusses two analyses of the Anaphor Agreement Effect (AAE, Rizzi 1990) in the light of novel data from Avar. By demonstrating that Avar anaphors trigger full, non-trivial agreement on the ϕ-probe, I argue that the Avar data instantiate a genuine exception to the AAE. I then compare two competing analyses of binding and the AAE: an account whereby anaphoric dependencies arise via the syntactic operation Agree (Murugesan 2018), and a theory deriving the inability of the anaphors’ ϕ-features to trigger full agreement from the presence of additional structural layers inside the anaphors that render the features inaccessible (Preminger 2019). I claim that the absence of the AAE in Avar supports the encapsulation analysis.

If you like this, or have a question or a comment, then please  share or reply on Twitter, or  email me.

← Automatic detection of natural phonological classes in Russian Sign Language | Writing Archive | Case marking in Russian eventive nominalisations revisited →


I’m Pavel Rudnev, and this is my personal website. I’m a research fellow and lecturer in linguistics at HSE University in Moscow. My main area of interest is syntax and its interfaces with sound and meaning. In particular, my current research revolves around the structure of nominal expressions, agreement, case and verbal morphosyntax in East Caucasian languages, and the syntax-to-phonology mapping in Russian Sign Language.



To receive updates from this site, you can follow me on Twitter at  @pavelrudnev, where I’ll update you if anything is posted.